Dear Hon. U.S. Congressional Members:

Re:  A Letter From an unborn involving Life and Death!  Please Issue a “Pardon” for millions of  unborn future U.S. Natural Born Citizens and unborn Catholics

 I am a very special unborn baby who wants to be a U.S. Natural Born Citizen.  As you know, God is pro-life.  He inspired me to communicate to you through  the printed word.  I can’t provide my name because I won’t be provided a name unless I can by-pass the mandated abortions being forced upon Catholic hospitals.  I am hoping to be born as a U.S. Natural Born citizen.   As you know, you hold the key to life and death for unborn babies in America and the world, and now Catholics. You see, my mother is a Catholic.  My father is a Christian.  But, my mother isn’t sure she wants another baby and I don’t know if she’s bought into the liberal brainwashing that an unborn baby is a non-person.

Although, I am what people refer to as a “fetus” or an “unborn baby” or even a non-person, the fact is that nothing came from something.  Of course, the doctors realize that I have a heart beat and I am a life form.  In fact, I out swam millions of other future competitors and made it across the finish line and won the opportunity to develop inside of my mother’s womb.  Everyone who makes it that far has great hopes of experiencing life.  I think of myself as God’s miracle. Ironically, it’s quite disturbing to see senators fighting tooth and nail to save a plant or a fish or bug, but strongly support forced abortions on Catholic Hospitals as well as mandated abortions upon the American taxpayers,  who oppose slaughtering millions of future U.S. natural born citizens,  and Catholics,  as immoral and against religious beliefs. Immorality and mocking God and the Bible is how the Fall of the Roman Empire ended.

Obviously, people have a choice, but it’s getting to the point where Americans don’t have a choice under the Obama administration.  But, people can choose to have sex and conceive a baby without protecting themselves knowing the consequences or they can choose to use protection or abstain. The choice should not include government passing laws which make the killing of unborn babies legal by calling the act of abortion without just cause legal. How is it that the government can deny my right-to-life with the stroke of a pen and can snuff me out by a heinous abortion treatment?

You have the power to save my life and the lives of millions of unborn future U.S. Natural Born Citizens and unborn Catholics.  But, it appears that under the current law, my future birth on U.S. soil is at risk, even in a Catholic Hospital.  I thought that I was safe on U.S. soil, and only had to fear, anti-American foreign nations, but I was wrong.  Since the U.S. Justices voted for Roe vs. Wade, my chances of taking my first breath out of the womb isn’t guaranteed.  So, I am writing to ask each of you if  myself or any of the unborn babies around the world did something wrong that may have offended you.  You see, my mom thinks that targeting Catholic hospitals for mandated abortions targets unborn Catholics and Christians, which could reduce the number of Catholics born, in the future.  In fact, I’ve heard my parents say that the Muslim Brotherhood’s stated strategic goal is to wipe out Western Civilization and dominate the world, so this begs the question if mandated abortions targeting Catholic Hospitals across America would help the Muslim Brotherhood diminish the number of Christians, who are Catholics, through abortions so they can achieve their goal as the dominant religion in the world.    

Remember, I’m an unborn future U.S. Natural Born  Citizen. My parents are  U.S. Natural Born Citizens. In fact, I am very excited about my development.  You see, God is so clever that he hooked me up to my mother’s life support machine which provides a myriad of nutrients and oxygen and helps me grow healthier every day.  Even if my mother doesn’t want to keep me, she doesn’t need to abort me, and you could change the law so she could place me on an adoption list.  

Obviously, I need your help in obtaining a ”Pardon” on my behalf and on behalf of all unborn babies in America and around the world.  We haven’t committed any crimes.  We don’t have lawyers to defend us.  We aren’t even given a just and fair trial.  We can’t defend ourselves, and no one can hear us.  Yet, we’ve been handed down a death sentence to be completed at the hands of abortionists for-profit.  Yes, I know my mother loves me a lot, but she’s very young and insecure.  She’s afraid to tell my future grandparents that she’s pregnant, so she’s going to Planned Parenthood for counseling.  And, under your mandated abortion laws including Catholic hospitals, my life is very much at risk.

Ironically, after all that effort to develop into a healthy unborn baby, I am at your mercy, Mr. President and Honorable Members of Congress.  You see, I am a baby boy with brown hair and blue eyes.  My heart beats just fine.  The doctor says I am perfectly healthy.  And, it’s exciting to know that I have millions of unborn brothers and sisters around the world of all races and ethnicities, but it’s also distressing to know unborn babies are targeted for death because you promote Pro-Choice organizations such as Planned Parenthood who perform abortions around the nation for-profit.  Therefore, you are rendering me no more than a commodity to be used by the government for their profitable abortion programs.

It is hard for myself and all  unborn future generations to understand why any public servant would play god and choose to end life vs. welcome life.  How is it that public servants can enforce laws which sentence unborn babies to death without mercy?.  As you are aware, the death sentence procedure performed by abortionists against unborn babies is heinous.  Did you know that unborn babies have feelings. I could hear people chattering about how abortions are performed and frankly, it scares me to death!  I heard them mention that a doctor injects chemicals inside of the womb to numb the unborn baby as well as the mother, as they prepare to stab the unborn baby in the head and suck out our brains.  If we’re not alive then why do they have to numb us and if we’re not human beings then why do they have to suck out our brains?  Therefore, I’m hoping you read my letter and stop worldwide abortions against the objections of the moral majority and Catholic-Christian majority.  How is the heinous act of abortion against unborn babies not considered a human rights violation?  Remember, there will never be another “me” created as every human being is unique. 

Therefore, let me ask you a question.  What would you do if the abortionists laid millions of babies on abortion tables across U.S. soil, which is now labeled a ”battlefield” and killed them while you watched each baby being stabbed on worldwide television.  How would you feel?  What would you do?  So, what’s the difference between that evil theory and the actual abortion techniques which are premeditated and carried out on abortion tables in America and around the world every day?  The difference is that abortions are performed in secret, silently, and there isn’t any media attention to the killing of unborn babies by abortion doctors as they commit this heinous procedure.

There is a silent “battlefield” going on in America and around the world, only the victims are unarmed and denied due process of law and have no rights. I’m sure there are pro-life supporters who wonder if more babies are killed by abortion than soldiers dying on foreign anti-American soil, as all abortions are not reported.

As a very unique unborn baby, I can hear people talking outside of the womb.  I heard a person saying that they sentenced a man to death for killing his wife and unborn baby and charged him with a double murder.  Yet, your laws state that killing an unborn baby by abortion and for-profit is legal because it is a non-person, so isn’t this rather hypocritical?  

Of course, as an unborn baby living inside of the womb, I’m very sensitive and scared to stick my head out of the womb for fear of being murdered by abortionists, who believe that it’s okay, to snuff me out, so they can fill their bank accounts.  My hope is that I will be born, which is the hope of every unborn baby, around the world.  My hope is that I won’t be aborted and I’ll be able to run for public office and defend life.  My mom said that President Ronald Reagan believed in the sanctity of life and believed it was the duty of moral men to protect the unborn babies.

 After all, unborn babies have no voice.  Their legal killings are silent. God sent me here for a purpose, but there are people who want me dead. I must tell you that the heinous way in which doctors may kill me by abortion is stressful and frightening.  You see, I can feel my heart beat, I eat, sleep, move, kick, stretch, grow, and most importantly, I can feel.  Have you ever pressed your hand on a pregnant wife’s tummy and felt the baby move?  Perhaps, if there wasn’t any profit in abortions then abortions and Planned Parenthood would cease to exist.

As an unborn baby who could be targeted for abortion, I think about life and death every day.  I worry that I may not be able to see my parents and grandparents if they abort me.  I worry that I  may not be able to laugh, cry, or say “I love you” to my family.  I worry that I may not be able to meet other children or pick a flower or run along the shores of the beach. I worry that I may not be able to give my mom and dad a hug and a kiss at night.  I truly thought that the politicians and judges in America swore to protect life, not take life.  Boy, was I wrong!

In my little mind, I think I deserve to live.  After all, I haven’t committed any crimes, yet, I’m accused and denied charges, a lawyer, or a trial and could receive a death sentence without mercy.  It appears that you don’t view me as being any different than a fly you swat and drop into the trash bin. But, if I’m not a living being then why do you have to kill me?

Therefore, I’m hoping that you can understand my point of view as I’m  looking from the inside of my mother’s womb out.  Abortion is a  matter of life and death.  Not so long ago, I heard people outside of the womb talking about depopulation.  In the bible, it reads, “….Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it….” Genesis 28.

Therefore, as an unborn future U.S. Citizen without a voice,  I am begging for my life and the lives of millions of unborn babies to be given the opportunity to experience life, just as you and your families have been blessed with life by God.  Would you want your children or grandchildren to be aborted, probably not, so why don’t you care about me and millions of worldwide unborn babies?  Under which constitutional or fiduciary duty did Americans and America’s public servants and doctors apply that provides them the authority to play God and determine who lives and who dies before an unborn baby takes a first breath? Trust me, God is very sad about the slaughtering of his creation which he gave to men and women as a gift.  The gift of life.  God’s wrath will come unexpected and it shall be swift as he cannot allow such immoral acts to continue.

Also, I remember my mother commenting that President Obama stated he’s a  Christian.  Therefore, he must know that God commanded a man and a woman  to become one and increase the population, not decrease the population upon the earth. So, Where’s Pastor Rick Warren on the issue of mandated abortions forced upon  Catholic-Christian hospitals?  After all, he appeared to be very concerned about Obama’s eligibility prior to the elections, so where does he stand on Obama’s obsession with  mandated abortions? 

My mom recalls that Senator Obama implemented the Global Poverty Act about December 2007 when he first mandated abortions worldwide without disclosure.  After the 2008 elections, Obama signed an Executive Order mandating worldwide abortion about January 2009.  In 2010, Obama signed Obama-Care into law against the will of the American people which included mandated abortions.   He followed up with his umbrella law referred to as Obama-Care mandating more abortions.  In 2012, he’s targeted Catholic Hospitals against their objections to perform abortions.

My mom is very intelligent.  She wonders if Obama is only targeting Catholic hospitals and if so, if the law is discriminatory against unborn future U.S. Natural born citizens and future unborn Catholics, or if he has mandated abortions, contraceptives, and abortion pills,  for  Muslims,  Satanists, Scientology, Mormons,  and Buddhists or atheists, since the U.S. Constitution guarantees the separation of church and state.

You see, I’m not just a “blob” of nothing.  I am a life form with a brain.  If I didn’t have a brain then why does the abortion doctor have to stab me in the head and suck out my brains should my mom decide to abort me?  If the fetus or unborn isn’t a baby then why do we have brains, eyes, require nourishment, move, kick, and feel?  And, if myself, an unborn baby aka fetus, isn’t alive, then why do we need to be killed?  Why do doctors need a law to make abortion legal if the unborn aka fetus isn’t alive and is a non-person?  Hitler viewed many people as non-persons and used radiation to sterilize the masses and it’s reported mandated abortions of those he persecuted.

For example, even a jelly fish, which was  believed to be no more than a transparent blob, is now believed to have a brain that can actually think and create armies against their prey. Too many public servants support mandated abortions which reduces the unborn babies, who are future U.S. Natural Born citizens, down to nothing more than disposable and discardable non-persons. In fact, I heard my mother say that the Komen Foundation, which supports saving women’s lives from breast cancer funds Planned Parenthood, so how do they justify that it’s okay to save the lives of women with breast cancer and simultaneously fund the killing of unborn babies performed by abortionists?

Consequently, I am pleading for my life and the lives of millions of unborn babies in the United States of America who are thriving in their mother’s wombs.  I am begging you to sign a “Pardon.”  I am pleading with you to spare my life, an unborn baby, one amongst millions,  as I am innocent of any crime.  Even criminals, who are found guilty in your world, have been pardoned.  Therefore, have you any mercy for me, an unborn baby, who wants to live?  I felt pretty safe until now because my mother is Catholic, but  it appears there isn’t a safe haven for the unborn babies even in a Catholic hospital. 

Let me leave you with one final question:  If  a child is killed by an abortion doctor using the same abortion method that he uses to abort an unborn baby then would you consider that a heinous crime against a minor child and premeditated murder?  Well, abortion is premeditated with the intent to kill unborn babies, so what’s the difference? 

Respectfully submitted,

Baby Doe,  An unborn future U.S. Natural Born Citizen and future unborn Catholic 

Rose Colombo is an award-winning writer, producer, and talk show host – seen and heard in local and national media and named a “Crusader” as  she catapulted a movement helping victims of legal abuses and injustices expose corruption.  She’s proposed laws which have been implemented and helped thousands of people over the past 25 years.   Her Irwin award-winning book, featured in the Daily Law Journal also received a Rave Review by the Veterans Reporter Newspaper as well as recommended by national talk show hosts - “Fight Back Legal Abuse: How To Protect Yourself From Your Own Attorney” can be ordered at Amazon or BN.com – Contact Irwin Zucker or Brad Butler for public speaking at 1-323-461-3921

Abraham Lincoln stated, “Don’t interfere with anything in the [U.S.] Constitution.  It must be maintained for it is the only safeguard of our liberties.”

The most alarming statement ever made during my life time which should have rocked the nation came from the lips of Senator Diane Feinstein who implemented sections 1031 and 1032, which is included into the NDAA-S.1867 law as follows:  “Congress is essentially authorizing the indefinite imprisonment of  American citizens without charge or trial.”  Although, some journalists say Americans are not included, my conversation with her staff member on Tuesday, March 28, 2011, said it is in effect currently unless and until it is voted upon and removed through legislation.

How then should Americans view their “homeland” and the “world,” perhaps as the new One World Order “battlefield” of “enemy combatants” subject to indefinite detention by the U.S. military, police, and federal government from anywhere around the world if ”accused” of a crime, and thereafter, denied all ”due process of law?”  Senator Lindsey Graham’s electrifying statement should have awakened the nation when he stated, ”The homeland is part of the battlefield and people can be held without trial whether a citizen or not.”  Although, Americans were assured that the NDAA law didn’t include Americans, Senator Feinstein’s disturbing laws included into the NDAA-S.1867, known as sections 1031 and 1032, include American citizens as Senator Graham stated on video. How is it that these senators and congress have granted themselves the authority to circumvent the U.S. Constitution?  And, as Judge Napolitano stated, “shred” the U.S. Constitution even though they swore to uphold, defend, and preserve the constitution as well as protect the American people from anti-American enemies, but instead, they have targeted American citizens as the possible “enemy combatants” if the federal government or U.S. military should “accuse” a citizen,  not charge a citizen.  Doesn’t this open the door for tyranny and abuse on U.S. soil by the federal government and U.S. military?  So, has the 112th Congress shredded the entire U.S. Constitution, because without ”due process of law,” there is no justice!

 Hear ye!  Hear ye!  All patriots in America, but alas, this cannot be true, as this must be no more than a fictional story,  along the lines of  War of the Worlds, or perhaps, one of my favorite movies,Valkyrie, as such a statement could only cause one to believe that such a law passed by congressional members - elected temporary public servants paid with tax dollars who voters and taxpayers  believed as having the highest level of  loyalty to the United States of America, which is a Republic, and the U.S. Constitution  - surely, this is no more than a mere figment of my imagination or one of my worst nightmares resulting in nothing more than a terrible miscommunication, right? 

This law, which includes sections 1031 and 1032,  into NDAA, jogs my memory as I recall Obama standing at the “wall” in Germany and stating, “People of the World” instead of addressing the “Citizens of America.”  It does appear that the words “world” and “globalists’seem to be the hot words for congressional members, public servants, and the elite, who support the U.N. and Agenda 21, and consider America as “oppressive,” even though it is America who they depend upon for their world charities and excessive lifestyles.  Is is possible that the members of the U.N. are pushing secretly to “redistribute” America’s wealth to Third World nations so Americans can be equally poor creating a nation of the wealthy and poor, thus eliminating the Middle Class?  And, if not, then how is it that congress and Obama have declared the  “homeland” to be nothing more than a ”battlefield” whose citizens can be targeted as ”enemy combatants” based on an “accusation” and punished with “indefinite detention” and denied “due process of law” which eliminates the third branch of government, the judiciary, as well as the need for judges or lawyers as the federal government and the U.S. military would be the accuser, judge, and jury.  

The ACLU published a statement in an article which reads:  “Don’t be confused by anyone claiming that the ‘indefinite detention’legislation doesn’t apply to American citizens.  It does.”

Oh, no, that can’t be possible!  We, the free and proud Americans whisper, after all, our elected congressional members, those who speak amongst us when campaigning, who we call “honorable” based upon our belief of  their integrity, loyalty to their country and the American people, the Flag, the military, and most  importantly, the U.S. Constitution, once elected would never declare war against their “homeland” or against the “world” which is sheer madness, right?  Obviously, only a mad person would have such thoughts as the U.S. Constitution has been upheld, defended by those who shed their blood, and preserved the constitution with the utmost care by the most patriotic and loyal Americans who pledged their oaths and would lay down their lives for America’s freedoms and liberties guaranteed by the most “precious” and important document ever written, except for the Ten Commandments and the word of God expressed in the Bible.

 Yes, it is true!  Sections 1031 and 1032, were included into NDAA, which were implemented by Senator Diane Feinstein (D-Ca.).  Feinstein’s sections 1031 and 1032, which Senator Levin stated in a letter did not include Americans, but it did include Americans when congress passed this unconstitutional law. Surely, the American people are burning up the wires demanding to know why Senator Feinstein,  their congressional representatives, and Obama, signed and approved sections 1031 and 1032 and didn’t strike them from the law titled  NDAA-S.1867 which shreds “due process of law” and renders Americans vulnerable to indefinite detainment based only on the federal government or U.S. military’s “accusations.” It’s time to ask how and why congress and Obama shredded “due process of law” as established for the protection of every person on U.S. soil .  They’ve violated their sworn oaths and fiduciary duty to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution.  How is it that Senator Graham and others are declaring that the ”world” and the “homeland” is a “battlefield” since Congress hasn’t declared war?  Why did Rep. Lindsey Graham state that ”people can be held without trial whether a citizen or not?”  How is it that Obama signed a law during election year that targets Americans being arrested without “charge” or “trial” based on an “accusation” - an ugly law titled, the  National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA-S.1867 with the inclusion of  Sections 1031 and 1032). 

Thus, Americans must demand to know under which constitutional authority and fiduciary duty congress is applying that provides congress with the authority to circumvent 235 years of established U.S. Constitutional law that guarantees”due process of law.”  Sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA law are not in accordance with the U.S. Constitution as required by law or the will of the majority of American people which are required components in the passage of laws. Laws passed must be just and fair and protect the American people, not target the American people and deny access to citizens seeking  justice. There is nothing just or fair about sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA-S.1867 law.  It should be quite disturbing to the American voters and taxpayers that congress and Obama would pass a law that provides the federal government the authority to by-pass the constitution and target American citizens as “enemy combatants,” on foreign or domestic soil, unless Congress has declared war on the “homeland” and the world” after labeling them as “battlefields” and all citizens as potential “enemy combatants.”  

Americans should write to congress and ask under which constitutional authority is congress applying that allows federal agents and the U.S. military to target American civilians as enemy combatants based on an accusation and strip American citizens of their constitutional rights and refuse to reveal the “charges” or refuse access to a lawyer as well as a fair and just “trial” or access a civilian court guaranteed to  U.S. legal and Natural Born citizens, but allegedly denied under sections 1031 and 1032 of the  NDAA-S.1867 law.

Again, Senator Feinstein implemented Sections 1031 and 1032 and stated on worldwide video “Congress is essentially authorizing the indefinite imprisonment of American citizens without charge or trial.”  Her statement should have shocked the nation as it rang out loud and clear, yet, some people don’t believe what they heard.  So, under which constitutional authority as elected public servants, who are paid with tax dollars to protect the American people and the U.S. Constitution, is Congress applying that provides them the constitutional authority to order the U.S. military to arrest civilians when the U.S. Constitution doesn’t provide that the military follow the President of the United States, but the Commander-in-Chief?  But citizens are required to follow constitutional laws rendered by the congress approved by the President of the U.S., not the military, which in my opinion, is an abuse of power. Ironically, even the U.S. military, provides for “due process of law” when they capture a foreign enemy or accuse a  U.S. soldier of a crime.  Although, there are journalists stating that this law,  Sections 1031 and 1032, doesn’t  include American citizens, Sections 1031 and 1032 are intact. Senator Feinstein and Graham made their voices quite clear that Americans are included, even if they remove those sections in the future, they remain intact today.  In fact, the denial of constitutional rights in courtrooms across this nation isn’t new, but for decades have been diminished in the media as “isolated” cases.  Unfortunately, most Americans have been blinded by the lack of truth in the media. So, early this morning, I phoned Senator Feinstein’s staff member and I asked if Sections 1031 and 1032 had been struck down as I was informed by a reporter, and I was told “no,” and that the law, sections 1031 and 1032 included into  the NDAA law are still “in effect” as of this date. So, I said, ”So, Americans can be targeted and arrested as “enemy combatants without “charge” or “trial” until or unless Sections 1031 and 1032 are removed.”  He said, ”Yes, they are still in effect.” 

Again, an important statement in an article published by the ACLU reads, ”Don’t be 
confused by anyone claiming that the “Indefinite Detention” legislation doesn’t apply to American citizens – it does.” 

So, what if the federal government secretly decided to target a race or an ethnic group or a grassroots group as their enemy and ordered their arrests without “charge” or without a “trial?”  Could any government under such a law have people removed from their homes and destroy their organizations or businesses by accusing people of crimes and arresting them without “due process” so they can create their utopia of rich and poor?

Americans should write or call their congressional members and ask, “When did Congress Declare War against America and the world as Rep. Lindsey Graham and Senator John McCain declared that the “homeland” and the “world” are a “battlefield?”  One should consider that in order to be an “enemy combatant” and live on a “battlefield,” one must be at war and at battle with the enemy, but I don’t see a war or a battle raging on U.S. soil or upon every nation throughout the world.  The danger of such a law is that the federal government determines who is an “enemy combatant” and who should be detained indefinitely without “charge” or “trial.” For example, the Obama administration called the Tea Party supporters “extremists” when they protested against Obamacare.  During WWII, the nazis ripped people out of their homes and businesses – arrested people on the spot based upon an accusation of being ”extremists.”  So,  sections 1031 and 1032, in my opinion, should be eliminated immediately.    

In an article published by the ACLU, it states that Rep. Lindsey Graham stated as follows: “section 1031, the statement of authority to detain, does not apply to American citizens….and designates the world as the ‘Battlefield’including the homeland.”  How then does congress justify that Americans are not targets of their own government if America is declared a “battlefield” because section 1032 includes Americans as potential targets of the government who can be detained indefinitely as ”enemy combatants” and denied ”due process of law.”  It would be wise to ask if Congress exempted themselves and their families from this same law dished out for the American people titled, NDAA including sections 1031 and 1032.  After all, they dished out Obamacare for the American people and exempted themselves.  They passed laws making “Insider Trading” illegal for Americans but legal for them and exempted themselves from punishment so they could commit the same crime and call it legal.  But, how can those in law enforcement remain silent about public servants writing loopholes into the laws so they can commit a crime and call it legal for them?  It does appear that much of the enforcement is only directed at the people, while those in public office are exempted and held above the laws, they dish out for everyone else. 

 On the other hand, if America is a “battlefield” then who is America battling on a daily basis?  It was Obama, who stated to the world, “America is not, and never will be at war with Islam!”  Bush and Obama, and McCain stated that Islam is a peaceful nation, therefore, why is America and the world declared “battlefields” if congress hasn’t declared who we are battling?

Ironically, congress and Obama never Declared War on Libya, but attacked Libya by firing off 220 Tomahawks as well as ordered the assassination of Gaddafi which resulted in killing his grandkids, yet they refused to call the NATO attack a “war.”  Instead, Obama referred to the attack on Libya as a NATO “mission” and promised no boots on the ground.  Obama justified his decision by stating that “America is not at war with Libya and that the law passed during the Vietnam war does not apply because the U.S. engagement does not rise to the level of “hostilities” contemplated by law. The NATO mission against  Libya resulted in the killing of freedom fighters, civilians, and Gaddafi’s grandkids as well as the  assassination of Gaddafi.  The news reported that Gaddafi’s teenage son and his friends were also killed while having dinner at a restaurant. Remember, Gaddafi, didn’t threaten or attack the U.S. prior to the U.S. attacking Libya, and even if considered an enemy, under U.S. constitutional law, he should have been captured and tried.  It is “due process of law” that sets America apart from the tyrants. In fact, Senator Richard Lugar (Ind) stated on the congressional floor, “We are not declaring war at this point [against Libya].”

Consequently, the American people didn’t pay much attention to the seriousness of the federal government ordering the assassination of Al-Awaki, who was an American citizen, and could have been captured by the federal government, arrested and tried in a court of law, since the Obama administration believed him to be an “enemy combatant.”  But, he was denied “due process of law” and placed on a “hit” list even though he was an American citizen.  Think about that – an American citizen was assassinated without “due process of law,” so can NDAA-S.1867 including sections 1031 and 1032 justify assassinations of Americans labeled as “enemy combatants” since Al-Awaki was an assassinated American labeled as an “enemy combatant?”  Just how far does the 112th Congress intend to circumvent due process of law and render Americans without constitutional protections should the government accuse a citizen of being an enemy combatant?” 

For example, Jose Padilla, an American citizen was arrested and indefinitely detained for 3 years and then allegedly without “charge” or “trial” sent to a Super Max prison for 17 years allegedly after being labeled as an “enemy combatant.” 

Richard Fine, Attorney, was allegedly indefinitely detained for about 2 years for exposing judicial corruption until he was finally release and denied “due process of law” as he pleaded for help on video seen on You Tube.

David Koresh, an American citizen, could have been arrested in town where the news reported he frequented and served with a subpoena or arrested, but instead, the women, children, and the men were burned alive by our federal government under the Clinton and Janet Reno administration.  What crimes did the women and children commit and even if they were accused of a crime, it can be very dangerous for citizens or even deadly when “due process of law” is denied on U.S. soil.

Randy Weaver, an American citizen, was at home and allegedly he wasn’t served with a subpoena or arrested, but the federal government surrounded his property and killed his wife holding a baby on the front porch and his little boy and his dog running through the forests which hit national news while Clinton and Janet Reno were in office, who allegedly viewed them, as enemies of the government. 

In fact, Judge Napolitano stated that congress ”shredded” the constitution when they passed sections 1031 and 1032 included in the law NDAA. If you’ve read my self-help book, ”Fight Back Legal Abuse,” you may recall my warning which states, “without due process of law there is nothing!”  If “due process of law” is shredded, there is nothing left but tyranny! In fact, Senator Udall, introduced the Udall Amendment which would delete sections 1031 and 1032 which is part of the NDAA law.

Ironically, on March 13, 2009, Obama announced that it would no longer refer to prisoners at GITMO as “enemy combatants” but also asserted that the [U.S.] president has the authority to detain terrorist suspects there without criminal charges….and his administration began deciding which detainees are eligible for trial in a military tribunal or civilian court. Surely, if the government were to target the Tea party or other grassroots political groups, many Americans could be arrested indefinitely to fill the secret prisons beds if sections 1031 and 1032 aren’t removed from the NDAA law. For example, McCain said people could be accused if they have missing fingers or if they store more than 7 or 8 days of food in their homes.  Well, that would target most Americans as “enemy combatants,” right?  In fact, there was a HLS Directive that stated that in an emergency, people who were targeted as “extremists” could be detained allegedly without due process of law.

How is it that when Obama took office, he verbally accused President Bush of allowing foreign enemy combatants dunked by a ”water boarding “ policy after 911.  Which is worse?  Water Boarding or Shredding the U.S. Constitution and  denying “due process of law?”

On March 21, 2011, Rep. Kucinich stated that Obama “crossed the line” calling the attack on Libya an indisputable “impeachment offense.”  And, Senator Richard Lugar (Ind) who is the top representative on Foreign Relations Committee also said, “We are not declaring war at this point, we’ve already fired off 110 missiles, tomahawks, at Libya and had some aircraft support…but my point this week publicly has been that if we were going to war with Libya we ought to have a Declaration of War by the Congress.”  Well, there was no Declaration of War by Congress.

Ironically, in 2007, Obama stated, “The President does not have the power under the constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”  So, again, I ask the question, “When did Congress declare war?  And, which nation is the “homeland” battling as well as what authority is congress applying that provides them the authority to target American citizens as “enemy combatants” and deny ”due process of law” under sections 1031 and 1032?

Rose Colombo, is a long time legal advocate and activist, seen and heard on local and major radio and television stations and winner of the Irwin Award winner of an empowering self-help book, ”Fight Back Legal Abuse” featured in the Daily Law Journal and in a rave review by the Veterans Reporter Newspaper as well as talk radio celebrity hosts. ”Fight Back Legal Abuse” is available on Amazon or BN.com -Rose is available for public speaking – Contact Irwin Zucker or Brad Butler at (323) 461-3921

Red Alert!  If this law passes, constitutional lawyers and parents need to file a lawsuit in the State of California - in my opinion - based upon the unprecedented and unconstitutional issues as well as the fact that indoctrinating minor kids as early as Kindergarten is not in the best interest of the minor children and jeopardizes the welfare and safety of every American minor child in my opinion!

Every parent and grandparent in the United States of America, every U.S. citizen, every Judeo-Christian and the moral majority must to fight back and save and protect the minor children from sexual preferences of the sponsors and the federal government who many practice and favor these sexual preference behaviors, but should not mandate them and force them into the lives of every American family by using taxpayer paid public schools. In my opinion, Ca. SB 48 contains immoral mandates which are unconstitutional because these mandates intentionally deny parental rights, religious rights, and individual rights. The expansion under the Obama regime as well as California governors over the past few decades appears to have no boundaries as it reaches its big foot from your front door into your living room and into your bedroom and now into your children’s bedrooms.  There are no boundaries for the politically active liberal socialists.  This law is intrusive and denies parental rights and mandates the indoctrination of minor children into unsafe sexual orientations which should not be the role of the federal government, but the right of every parent according to their moral and religious beliefs.  The following shocking information was sent to me and I am re-posting:

“In six weeks, the most in-your-face Sexual Indoctrination Law SB 48 mandating homosexuality, transsexual role models goes into effect – SB 48′s “supplemental materials” include (handouts, homosexual biographies, classroom discussions, essays, and other homework, outside speakers, videos, dramas, etc.) and will teach children as young as kindergarten that unnatural and unhealthy homosexuality, cross-dressing, sex changes, homosexual marriages, and more” are actually good and natural and that the LBGT agenda should be politically supported.  [Probably includes "bestiality" - This could lead to the activists pushing for pedophilia to be legalized, as well.]

2.  “On top of SB 48, (7) seven statewide laws mandating the homosexual, bi-sexual, transgender sexual agendas as well as heterosexual fornication in every government school in California without exception and without parental exemption.” [from this curriculum].

3.  “Three (3) out of four (4) – fourth graders in California government schools cannot READ proficiently.”  [They are removing police safety, computer classes, and P.E. and Music because the politicians say California can't afford these classes, but they can afford to replace those classes with unprecedented and unconstitutional sexual preferences and behaviors as well as indoctrination as normal even if it is offensive to Christians, moral majority, and parents and grandparents?]

4.  “It is unlawful for California public schools to protect children from STD’s, out-of-wedlock pregnancies  and broken hearts, by teaching them how to effectively abstain from sexual activity before marriage.”  [In other words, the morals of parents and Christians and the moral majority are "meaningless" to these law makers who are indoctrinating children into sexual inappropriate behaviors and risking their emotional and physical health in my opinion! They can't afford to teach kids reading, but they can afford to fund Planned Parenthood so kids can have sex and get abortions at taxpayer's expense!]

5.  “It is unlawful in California government schools to teach children even the theory that they were created by God.  Instead, they’re taught they came from primordial goo.” 

See all ten (1) disturbing facts on the special site -http://www.rescueyourchild.com

www.sermonaudio.com  –  www.ChristianPost.com  –  http://www.savechildren.com

Constitutional Law:  1) The Thomas More Law Center;  2) Liberty Counsel; 3) Attorney Jay Sekulow’s organization, the ACLJ  (search for further information on-line)

God Help This Nation from the evil that the politically correct leaders paid with tax dollars are teaching is normal and good in violation of Christianity and morality and not in the best interest of the minor children.

Rose Colombo does not take any credit for the above post, but hopes and prays that everyone will call Governor Jerry Brown and members of the California Senate and Oppose Ca. SB 48 – immediately – and stop this inappropriate and unconstitutional unprecedented indoctrination of children into a life of promiscuity and possibly pregnancy and emotional problems as well as STD’s or even death or prostitution.  Colombo is a legal activist, award-winning writer on injustices who has been named a “Crusader for Justice.”  She’s authored an Irwin award-winning book and she’s been featured on major and local TV and radio and newspapers.  Rose is available for speaking engagements by calling:  Brad Butler or Irwin Zucker at (310) 461-3921

     Legal Abuse is not new!  After Obama was elected as U.S. President without proper vetting, he and his supporters enacted a new definition of what is illegal for the people vs. what is illegal for congress.  The new definition of illegal is titled ”inversion!”  What is illegal for the American people is legal for congress!  This new congress that sees the constitution as “meaningless” for them have created a “them against us” society.  They are holding themselves above the law and view themselves as royalty and the people as peasants who are nothing more than numbers, possibly to be depopulated under the U.N.’s Agenda 21 program; mandated abortions, gay indoctrination, euthanasia; rationing of health care services; radiation; and excessive laws which deny due process of law in some cases;  a “hit” list, as well as, the illegal and indefinite imprisonment of  American citizens, which is unconstitutional under our nation’s laws.  Yet, the U.S. Congress and Department of Justice, as well as, the ABA Constitutional Lawyers continue to remain silent.  These mandates, requirements, and laws which circumvent the U.S. Constitution do not reflect the Constitution of the United States or federal  job descriptions.  They fly in the face of  America’s Rule of Law in every way, shape or form.  Every  federal public servant, who remains silent and fails to perform their fiduciary job duty for which they are paid by the taxpayers, are guilty.  A job and wages in exchange for public servants whose fiduciary duty it is to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America is a legal binding contract according to the law.  A job as a public servant does not include the authority to circumvent the constitution and rule by Executive Order.  Executive Orders are not laws.

Every public servant should search their conscience and if they choose to abuse their power and deny constitutional rights to the citizens of the United States, then they are violating their fiduciary duty to their constituents in exchange for their jobs and taxpayer wages and therefore, should step down.  How then shall we deal with those public servants who refuse to step down, but are in violation of their sworn oath and without conscience stonewall due process of law, while protecting their own?  In fact, some lawyers and judges believe that they can trample on the constitution and establish a foreign law in our courtrooms.  The enemy of a great nation is like a big fat yellow belly rattle snake with giant fangs, who lies dormant, still, and hidden away, but at a calculated moment, he strikes at his enemy and poisons his prey. 

As a long time advocate for justice who has monitored the courts and helped people who ended up victims for years, documenting their cases and researching the law, I can tell you from first-hand experience that unless you’ve walked through the fires and tribulations, you cannot call yourself an “expert” or an “authority” on corruption or legal abuse.  Talk show hosts may read the information provided by those who have been exposing injustices for years, but the experience and knowledge gained after 25 years of research only touches the surface of what happens to the victims without anywhere to go for help.

Ironically, I found myself intrigued by articles in the newspapers or Newsweek or Time Magazine during the 80s and 90s.  One such article which caught my attention and stuck in my head was written by a reporter who said that the government was creating a “them against us society.”  A most fascinating article hit a major news magazine about 1990 which stated that the law schools were graduating so many lawyers that it would create an over abundance of lawyers within ten years and there would be hungry lawyers looking for the same jobs.  So, what was the remedy?  Legislatures must create more laws so the general public will intentionally or unintentionally or through ignorance violate more laws and keep the ”machine” in operation.  

For example, perjury for the powerful is referred to as “a mistake.”  Mismanagement of $10,000,000 of stimulus tax dollars promised for jobs but used for buying and selling guns for criminals is referred to as “negligence.”  Insider Trading by congressional members or other public servants is referred to as a “legal.”  The lawmakers who swear to uphold the Rule of Law boldly state that it is legal for congress to commit the crime of “insider trading” because they have provided themselves the authority to do so outside of the Rule of Law.  They have used their positions to circumvent the constitution and expect the voters and taxpayers to believe they have the authority to hold themselves above the law and exempt themselves from the law, prosecution, lawsuits, or fines. 

Therefore, I decided to include an excerpt from my Irwin Award winning book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” featured in the Daily Law Journal, which reflects what is recurring in the executive and congressional and judicial branches of our government, as they hold themselves above U.S. Constitutional law, protect their own, rendering the Constitution and the Bill of Rights dead on arrival before you hit the courtroom!

An excerpt from “Fight Back Legal Abuse” (C) involving a true story of a former Treasury Agent assigned to Organized Crime Strike Force, Mr. George Wright,  who believed that public servants and prominent people should be held to the same standard of the law, but found out the hard way that those in positions of power didn’t agree:   

“The investigation was done for all the right reasons, but the system broke down…deciding that public attention would be the only way which the Wyoming case would be prosecuted, I again contacted the Los Angeles Times.”  He says, “My decision was not an easy one, I had violated department regulations and knew the risks involved.  He said, Our public officials and prominent business leaders should be held to the same standards of conduct as everyone else.  Crime is crime.”

“Wright was seeking justice, but instead, he says, “On a sweltering Friday, July 1, 1974, the supervisor of the Los Angeles Office of the U.S. Treasury Department called me into his office.  He said, ‘Wright, Washington advises me to have you turn in your badge, gun, credit card and cash advance.  You are relieved of your responsibilities here.  Furthermore, Washington is considering prosecuting you on as of yet, undetermined charges.’  Wright said, “I wanted to remember my badge the way it was, not the distorted image it had become.”  He says, On July 4th, 1974, while America celebrated its independence, I was being separated forever from government service because I’d done what I thought was right.”  He said he wrote a resignation letter, but the government wouldn’t accept it and “I was told that the wording was not acceptable and that if it was not changed, I would be prosecuted.”

     Wright asked, “What are the charges?”  The man from Washington responded, “We are prepared to arrest you immediately on charges of treason, espionage, giving out confidential income tax information, selling diagrams of government installations to a foreign power.”  And, then almost as if an afterthought, he added….”and the misdemeanor for giving information to the press without going through channels.”

     Mr. Wright said, “If they arrested me, I’d have a criminal rap sheet and would spend the rest of my life explaining how I came to be arrested for treason and espionage.  Not only would my career have been over, but my job prospects would never exceed folding napkins at a taco stand.  I had no choice at all.  Wiping away tears of sad frustration, the secretary slowly typed my second letter of resignation…..”

(This article may be shared, but no part of this article may be copied without the express permission of the publisher or author as stated under copyright laws in the book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse”).  On the back cover of my book is a quote from a letter written to me from the Hon. Nancy Wieben Stock…..”and the truth shall set us free.”

This is an excerpt from the Irwin Award winner and nominee for the Global E-Book Awards, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” is featured in the Daily Law Journal and given a rave review by the editor of a Nevada Newspaper.  Rose has been interviewed on national radio stations and major and local TV stations.  She’s an invited public speaker on legal abuse and considered an “authority” by her peers.  If you would like to invite Rose Colombo to be a guest speaker at your event, please contact

 Brad Butler or Irwin Zucker at 323-461-3921.

Occupy Wall Street made a statement whether people agree or not, at least they protested the long arm reaching from the White House into Wall Street and Wall Street reaching into the White House.  In fact,  the majority of citizens don’t believe they have the power to change the winds that have been shifting in an ugly direction as the federal government is trampling on the constitution and the “limited power” that is established by constitutional law.  Americans need to unite against the double standards that have been secretly implemented by past and current congressional members who are filling their bank accounts on the taxpayer’s time and dime!

How many Americans have looked up the definition of “Insider Trading?”  Are you aware that insider trading is illegal and that the Department of Justice went after “Martha” who made a pittance on her investment in comparison to former Speaker Pelosi, so how is that?

Insider Trading is:  “The use of material, non-public information in trading the shares of a company by a corporate insider or other person who owes a “fiduciary duty” to the company.”  How is it that the U.S. Congress no longer believes that they have a “fiduciary duty” to the American people as well as to the corporations who are seeking the approval or denial of bills before the U.S. Congress? 

Furthermore, “This is the classic definition.  The Supreme Court has also approved a broader definition known as the “misappropriation theory;” the deceitful acquisition and misuse of information that property belongs to persons to whom one owes a duty.” 

Obviously, members of congress are provided confidential information which could enhance their financial wealth outside of their job description if they choose to abuse their power on taxpayer’s time and work on personal “insider trading” on the job.  Americans don’t pay public servants to work on their personal Wall Street portfolios, but pay them to protect the public from unethical laws.  Federal employees are paid by the taxpayers to review corporate laws for approval or denial and determine if it is in the best interest of the American people, not in the best interest of congress as they withhold or deny or approve corporate laws presented to them for a vote based on insider trade secrets.  How is it not considered a Conflict of Interest or misappropriation as well as deceitful and unethical for congressional members to work on personal “insider trade” secrets for  personal financial gain while working as  federal employees working on the clock and paid with taxpayer dollars?  If congressional members feel it is ethical to use confidential information seeking insider trade secrets on the job than they should clock out!   

On its face, it would appear that the Judicial Ethics Committee would be reviewing the Conflict of Interest, as well as the “misappropriation theory” and “deceitful acquisition or “misuse” of information which was intended for the purposes of ensuring the people were protected from big corporations on Wall Street.  So, this would explain why the American people are concerned about the U.S. Congress and Executive Office climbing in bed with Wall Street as the people line the streets protesting the double standards. 

Last week, the senate voted to deny the American people the right to exercise freedom of speech on the internet by passing a bill titled ”Net Neutrality.”  It is my suggestion that the American people and media wake up, because “Net Neutrality” circumvents the First Amendment and could devastate careers and corporations who promote themselves on the internet. This is a very dangerous attack against Freedom of Speech by the Obama administration.  Such a law could target people who protest against corruption between the White House and Wall Street. 

Fortunately, CBS exposed a third big scandal related to the Obama administration and Congress. The U.S. Congress, past and current, passed laws stating that “insider trading” is illegal, but with deceit and non-disclosure, Congress created a double standard for congressional members making “insider trading” for congressional members legal.  Congress has written laws that circumvent the laws established for the American people by writing self-serving laws which exempt themselves from complying with the established laws mandated for all citizens and self-protecting laws which prohibit them from being prosecuted for “insider trading.”  In other words, what they implemented as “illegal” insider trading for all other citizens is “legal” for congress.

How is it legal and ethical for congressional members to re-write laws which circumvent the laws of the land, while simultaneously abusing their positions of power to write laws that allow them to violate the law with immunity, while on the job and racking up wages paid by the U.S. taxpayers?  The American people were led to believe that they voted for congressional representatives who would review corporate documents and determine what is in the best interest of the American people, not in the best interest of congressional members on taxpayer’s dime!

Under which congressional authority and fiduciary duty or job description is it that allows congress to circumvent the constitution by writing self-serving laws that protect them from complying with laws and from punishment, so they can fill their bank accounts, by creating double standards which favor congress?

So, how does congress justify their “insider trading” on the job for their personal financial gain when they are paid to protect the people from criminals who are arrested for insider trading?”  For example, a bank clerk wouldn’t be allowed to study the customer’s portfolios and discuss insider trade secrets on the job without being fired, yet there are congressional members using their time on the job paid by taxpayers for personal financial gain.  

Which constitutional law or fiduciary job description did Rep. Pelosi apply that justifies her using confidential information which is the property of the government as personal information which in my opinion is unethical with the intent of using the “insider trading” secrets for her personal financial gain?  How is it okay for any employee to use information that belongs to the government or to a corporation for personal use?  In the private sector, employees would be fired.

Is it ethical for congress and the executive office to write self-serving, self-regulatory, and self-protecting laws for self-gain that provides them exemptions from compliance and exemption from punishment after mandating that all other citizens must comply with the laws which they mandate or else be punished such as  “insider trading” and “Obama care?”

Which constitutional amendment or the federal job description provides congress the authority to write approve, and enforce “insider trading” as illegal for the American people, but “legal for congressional members?

Consequently, I have determined that some congressional members believe that they have the authority to abuse their positions of power, even if it involves ethics violations and conflicts of interest to provide themselves immunity when they use “insider trading” secrets for financial gain by deeming ”insider trading” as “illegal” for the citizens, but “legal” for congressional members who commit the same white-collar crime without fear of being  punished.  

In conclusion, as long as the American people remain passive and accept that lawmakers can become law breakers by re-writing laws, manipulating the law, changing laws that are self-protecting from compliance and prosecution, the American people will be faced with double standards, unconstitutional laws, and a constitution that their leaders believe the words of Obama when he stated in 2001 and 2008 that the constitution is no more than a charter of negative laws [liberties] that is “meaningless.”    

Rose Colombo, is the producer and host of  former cable TV and talk radio show, “Issues of the Day.”  She’s been seen and or heard on ABC news and talk radio, KTTV, Channel 13, KFI Talk Radio, and many national and local stations…..she’s been published and quoted in local and major newspapers, i.e., L.A. Times; OC Register, Denver Post, Boston Globe and is honored as an award winning local columnist titled, “One Woman’s Opinion. ” Rose is a public speaker and noted by media personalities and community groups as the authority or expert on injustices and legal abuse.  She’s been a  guest speaker of the Media Breakfast Club;  Granada Forum; L.A. Status on Women; Chambers of Commerce, L.A. Press Club Speaker’s Bureau and more…..She’s a seasoned legal advocate for justice, legal activist who founded the first group in the nation helping thousands of victims across the nation move on with their lives.  Rose proposed laws that are implemented.  Her Irwin award-winning book,  “Fight Back Legal Abuse” is recommended by national celebrity hosts and as a “crusader” and the “expert” on injustices and legal abuse.  Rose is available for public speaking engagements and if interested, please contact her agent, Irwin Zucker or Brad Butler at (323) 461-3921

Follow Rose on Twitter: Rose4Justce or visit her webiste at www.fightbacklegalabuse.com

We The People exercise our constitutional right to file this Grievance and demand that the U.S. Senate follow through and appoint a Special Prosecutor in the egregious matter of Fast and Furious: a Gunrunning program launched on or about March 2009.  Thousands of murders by assassination along the borders were carried out with U.S. guns sold to ruthless criminal cartel members  between 2009 – 2011.  The victims were a majority of innocent Mexican citizens who called out to the U.S. for help, but also included law enforcement victims who were murdered by their own agency’s sale of U.S. guns sold to cartel members which is unconscionable.    

Furthermore, how is it that media alleges that the executive office has enacted an assassination “hit”  list, not only against America’s enemies, but allegedly against unarmed foreigners and American citizens who President Obama (or Panetta?) decide should be included on a “hit” list without due process of law at the hand of our own government?  It is not only a sin but immoral and unethical to use taxpayer dollars to assassinate unarmed people and American citizens.  If that’s the case, why did we go to war against Saddam or attempt to assassinate Gaddafi who are said to be tyrants who assassinate their own citizens without due process of law?  A U.S. “hit” list is the same as telling Americans that they are going to pay for their possible “assassination” with their own tax dollars!  

Furthermore, there is the push by this administration to disarm Americans. President Obama stated on Meet the Press in 2008:  “It’s my intention, if elected, to disarm Americans to the level of acceptance to our Middle East brethren.”

  The news reports every day that Iran and other Middle East nations as well as Korea and Russia are arming themselves with nuclear weapons. In fact, China has been building up its armies and weapons for decades. So, if Americans were disarmed as the Obama and Clinton administration propose then the American people would be left defenseless against criminals or an invasion by their enemies.  It appears that the most prominent names pushing hard to disarm Americans are President Obama, Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, Senator Feinstein, Senator Shumer, and New York Mayor, Bloomberg, and now Homeland Security proposes laws to spy and track innocent Americans at Wal-Mart and gun stores, who purchase guns and ammunition, but didn’t RFID tag the U.S. guns sold to ruthless cartel members.  There are hundreds of missing guns!

Consequently, President Obama allegedly switched $10 million of U.S. Stimulus Money from the Recovery Fund for his program, “Fast and Furious and Gun-running.” In “Good Faith,” the  American people believed President Obama, when he promised to use the stimulus money to “create jobs.”  Instead, America’s tax dollars were turned into blood money.  The fact that missing guns are in the hands of criminals sold to them by our federal government renders every man, woman, and child on both sides of the borders potential victims.

How is it that the Obama czars,  the U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder,  and the Homeland  Security administration has funding and procedures in place to track legal citizens on U.S. soil, who purchase guns, but they didn’t bother to monitor and track, videotape, photograph, audio tape, and follow basic surveillance procedures when they sold U.S. guns using straw buyers to traffic guns into Mexico that were sold to cartel members on foreign soil? 

We The People commend Representatives Darrel Issa and Charles Grassley.  We The People believe this is one of the biggest scandals to hit our nation.  More people have been assassinated in two years, 2009-2011 than in some wars or ethnic cleansing ordered by tyrannical leaders. 

 Below is a list of events involving public servants in the media who have been actively engaged in gun control legislation; the Second Amendment; the gun trafficking into  Mexico while tracking Americans buying legal guns after the lone assassin murdered and injured innocent people and Rep. Gifford in Arizona; but the federal government failed to track ruthless cartel members for two years. 

The following list below is a compilation of events reported in the news relating to gun control by U.S. federal government representatives commencing in 1992:

1.  1992:  Senator Hillary Clinton supported a federal ban on semi-automatic firearms.

2.  2000:  Senator Hillary Clinton favors “sensible gun control legislation, but limiting gun control lawsuits.  She made gun licensing and registration a part of her 2000 senate campaign.  She also made strict gun control laws at the federal level part of her 2008 presidential campaign.

3.  March 24, 2003: SB 1195 – Obama votes to ban many rifles and shotguns in the U.S.

4.  March 25, 2004:  SB 2165 – Obama voted to prosecute people who use a gun for self-defense in their homes (which is law in Great Britain rendering the victims helpless against a criminal)

5.  July 29, 2005:  S 397 – Obama voted to ban almost all rifle ammunition used for hunting and fishing

6.  September 2005:  Obama opposes the right of citizens to carry hand guns – Chicago Tribune

7.  2006:  Mayor Bloomberg helps organize a coalition of mayors to perform background checks on customers who buy guns and clerks who sell guns; videotaping the sales; and keeping a record each time the BATF and Explosive links a gun buy at other guns and the purchase flagged. [Ironically, the BATF is required by HLS to link into legal sales of law-abiding Americans, but the Obama administration didn't tell Americans they were paying to have the  BATF sell U.S. guns purchased on U.S. soil for gun trafficking without any tracking of illegal guns or the cartel criminals]

8.  2008:  New York Times:  “Mayor and Wal-Mart Back Gun Sales Plan” – “A coalition of mayors….led by Michael R. Bloomberg of New York…said it had reached a 10 point agreement with Wal-Mart, the country’s largest seller of guns to track the sales of firearms more closely which include criminal background check of even store clerks.” [ironically, Obama and Bloomberg and Hillary want to spy on law abiding citizens and investigate U.S. citizens who purchase guns and ammunitin as well as other consumer items on U.S. soil, but they don't care that President Obama conceals all his background records].

9. October 20, 2008:  Meet the Press – Obama said, “It’s my intention if elected to DISARM Americans to the level of acceptance to our Middle East brethren.”

10.  March 13, 2009:  Gun Ban List:  HR 1022 - Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton and President Obama support U.N. Treaty to ban guns in the United States and by-pass the Second Amendment. 

11.  L.A. Times 3/27/2009:  “U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton ending, a 2 day visit to Mexico centered heavily on the drug war toured a state of the art police center and condemned drug violence meeting with university students….This situation is intolerable for honest law-abiding citizens of Mexico, my country, or of anywhere of ‘conscience live,’she said.”

Also, “Clinton acknowledged that the U.S. bears some blame for the crisis because of its insatiable appetite for illicit drugs and its role as a supplier of weapons that are SMUGGLED into Mexico to the cartels by ‘hit’men.”

“President Felipe Calderon’s government applauded on Obama’s administration plan….that will place more U.S. agents and other personnel along the border.”

12.   March 2009:  Letter from senators Dick Durbin and Diane Feinstein…..” According to the ATF more than 90% of the guns seized after raids or shootings in Mexico have been traced right here to the U.S. of A.  Feinstein added that it is unacceptable to have 90% of the guns that are picked up in Mexico to shoot judges, police officers, mayors, kidnap innocent people and do terrible things coming from theU.S. and I think we must put a stop to that….[the actual number of guns according to Fact Check and Fox was 17%].  They pushed for a massive new gun control and assault weapons ban.

13.  March 24, 2009: YouTube: “Obama Orders Launch of Fast & Furious”: Deputy A.G. Ogden announcing on national television that President Obama launched Fast and Furious and approved $10 million from the Stimulus Recovery Fund for the program naming Holder and Ogden to head it up.

14.  May 12, 2009, You Tube: “Did Obama Make You Laugh”- Obama said Hillary Clinton just returned from Mexico [regarding guns and drugs] and these days they’ve gotten very close and she kissed him.

15.  August 14, 2009:  CNN, Anderson Cooper, You Tube, Part 1:  “Mexico Says Guns Coming From U.S.”

16.  August 14, 2009, CNN Anderson Cooper, You Tube, Part 2:  Mexico Says Guns Coming From U.S.” – and Mexican officials state the guns coming into Mexico from the U.S. are the key problem to the assassinations.

17.  June 28, 2010:  The Washington Times reads “Dozens of U.S. Citizens may be targets of Assassination by Obama.” 

18.  July 20, 2010:  The Examiner by Howard Portney read:  “Obama Assassination List: The Troubling Reality” – “In an interview last Thursday with Washington Times, John Brennan, the president’s most senior advisor on counterterrorism and Homeland Security reveals that the Obama administration maintains a list of American citizens who have been targeted for assassination.”

Although, these are considered bad men and enemies or war criminals, since when does America assassinate unarmed people and dispose of their bodies; unarmed Americans who aren’t charged with a crime and visited the Pentagon as their guest;  or attempted assassinations against foreign leaders who never threatened to attack America?

19.  May 21, 2010: The Daily Paul – “Hillary Clinton Supports the Small Arms Treaty with the Second Amendment in Jeopardy” – Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton support U.N. Treaty and may attempt to by-pass congress and ban guns in U.S.

20.  June 18, 2010, NewsMax: ”Obama Administration to File Lawsuit Against Arizona’s Immigration Law” - and, “Hillary Clinton stated, ‘President Obama has spoken out against the law because he thinks that the federal government should be determining immigration policy.’  Clinton said in an interview.  “And, the Justice Department, under his direction, will be bringing a lawsuit against the act.” 

21.  August 24, 2010, ImpeachObamaCampaign.com – “Obama hauls Arizona before the U.N. Human Rights Council.  The president’s first-ever report on U.S. Human Rights to the U.N. Human Rights Council contains a rich vein of offensive material….to bash Arizona’s immigration law and possibly transfer jurisdiction over from Arizona to the U.N.

22.  August 24, 2010, ImpeachObamaCampaign.com – On Obama’s command, Attorney General, Eric Holder, has sued the State of Arizona for passing a law that he criticized without reading and which merely uphold federal law….and threatens to give sanctuary cities a pass and threatens an additional lawsuit against Sheriff Arpaio for racial profiling.

23.  August 2010:  Rep. Gifford Supports Gun Rights:  She opposed the Washington D.C. ”Gun Ban” by signing an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court to support its overturn.

24.  August 2010:  Rep. Gifford and Secure Borders:  Gifford supports secure borders in support of Governor Brewer’s efforts and Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s efforts.  She supported the passage of the bill to fund more Border Patrol agents and install surveillance technology at the borders as well as bringing in the National Guard.

25.  September 2, 2010:  Gateway Pundit – “Radical Obama Justice Department Sues Sheriff Joe Arpaio” – “The Wall Street Journal” reported – “The Justice Department filed a civil lawsuit against Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County accusing him and his agency of stonewalling a probe into policing practice that some call discriminatory against Hispanics.  [Ironically, the senate has alleged that Holder is stonewalling in providing the senators with documentation that they had subpoenaed in the case of Fast and Furious]

26.  January 8, 2011:  Assassination attempt on Rep. Gabrielle Gifford, who was shot in the head, by Jared Lee Laughner, a lone assassin, near Tucson, in a Safeway parking lot as she was speaking to her constituents.  Fortunately, she survived and is making a wonderful recovery according to the news.

27.  Laughner was reported to have murdered 19 people and killed six of those in attendance with one injury.  He was arrested by authorities, but like Timothy McVeigh, America’s heard very little about them.  

28.  January 8, 2011:  LiteNews.com –  U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Chief Judge, John Roll, a strong Catholic man who attended Catholic schools and was pro-life.  Judge Roll was appointed by pro-life President George Bush.  He attended Mass before attending Gifford’s event and he was assassinated by Laughner.  Roll opposed taxpayer-funded abortions which was scheduled to be heard and voted upon one week after his death, but the news reported the voting had been  postponed after the assassination. Senator Obama supported mandated abortions worlwide and supports the bill he proposed and implemented into law in Dec. 2007 and signed into law as an Executive Order in January 2009 without transparency.  The mandated abortion law requiring U.S. taxpayers to pick up the world’s tab for mandated abortions through Obamacare was opposed by pro-life supporters such as Judge Roll.  Obama approved multimillions in tax dollars for abortions to Planned Parenthood which could have created many jobs for Americans rather than killing off future unborn U.S. Natural Born citizens by abortion. 

29. February 23, 2011 Letter:  Senator Schumer and N.Y. Mayor Bloomberg call for stricter gun control laws saying, “President Obama could accomplish some better information sharing among federal agencies by Executive Order and that he was working with them on it.”

30.   February 2011 Letter posted on-line:  Senator Diane Feinstein and Charles Schumer blame U.S. for sending military style weapons into Mexico.  “Congress has been virtually moribund while powerful Mexican drug trafficking organizations continue to gain unfettered access to military style firearms coming from the U.S.”

31.  June 2011 Letter from Senator Feinstein:  “Congress should renew the assault weapons ban which would help to prevent traffickers from obtaining the most deadly weapons now arming Mexico’s drug trafficking organizations.  This administration routinely ignores subpoenas.  The killings reached their highest levels in 2010 increasing by almost 60% to 15,273 deaths from 9,616 the previous year.”  [2009].

32.  May 23, 2011:  CNN seen on You Tube video:  Rep. Issa questions A.G. Holder at senate hearings who testified under oath that he just recently learned of Fast and Furious in the last few weeks.  [see video of 3/24/2009 with deputy A.G. Ogden)

33.  2009-2011 – Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, President Obama, and Senator Feinstein support the U.N. Small Arms Treaty which would disarm Americans and trample on the Second Amendment.

On or about March 20, 2011, Obama attacked Libya with an alleged assassination attempt against Gaddafi, but instead killed innocent freedom fighters and Gaddafi’s grandkids, as Gaddafi, didn’t threaten America.  On or about May 2, 2011, Obama ordered the assassination of an unarmed war criminal named Osama bin laden and disposed of the body.  On or about September 30, 2011, Obama ordered the assassination of an American who wasn’t charged with a crime named Al-Awaki.  Did all three assassinations by-pass congressional and constitutional law? So, how is it that there are so many assassinations such as these and the assassination of a federal judge and an attempted assassination on the life of a congressional member as well as the assassination of thousands of innocent Mexicans and some Americans murdered with America’s guns sold without tracking on foreign soil to cartel criminals paid for with U.S. tax dollars while the constitution and congressional authority appear to be “meaningless?”  These tragedies have cast a dark shadow over the federal government causing the American people to doubt the integrity of their own government as well as live in fear.

     In conclusion, We The People, submit this Grievance demanding that the U.S. Congress investigate the events involving gun control and Fast and Furious Gunrunning, going back to 1992 - to-date,  as well as the authority which a president or congress is applying providing them the authority to gather a “hit” list to murder by assassination without congressional and constitutional authority, especially against unarmed persons and American citizens.  The fact that the federal government sold hundreds of guns to cartel members which are missing renders every man, woman, and child, on both sides of the borders potential victims in the present time or future.

The above research was gathered for educational purposes and submitted to the best of my ability and knowledge as reported for public review.

The liberals gathered to support president Obama who promised to bring “change” to America.  He stated to the audience that he was going to attack them with drones and they laughed.  He said, “You think I’m joking.” And the audience continued to laugh and applaud.  Today, Americans are faced with a unvetted president who holds himself above congressional and constitutional law.  The news reported Obama is appointing a panel to create a list of names of Americans who will be murdered by assassination. Is everyone still laughing?

Although, the president’s Executive Order allegedly grants unprecedented authority so he can order murder by assassination as revealed awhile back, the media disregarded the information.  Most recently, the news reported that Obama ordered a “hit” on an American citizen named Al-Awaki.  He was reported dead but the government said that they didn’t retrieve the body.  Although, Al-Awaki converted to the Muslim faith and spoke out heatedly, there weren’t any criminal charges filed against him, so due process of law was denied.  This begs the question if  Obama can circumvent congressional and constitutional law and does he have legal authority to order “hits” on American citizens?  Reported on the anti-war.com blog is an article that states “Obama has Awlaki’s 16-year-old son, friends killed at dinner,” but difficult to find in main stream news. 

Also, Obama has allegations written into lawsuits filed with the courts by attorneys Orly Taitz and Phil J. Berg,  as well as a recent FBI complaint filed by computer experts alleging Obama’s birth certificates are forgeries. Ironically, Obama  has allegations filed against him with the courts and FBI, yet he was allowed to order a “hit” on Al-Awaki, who didn’t have any criminal charges filed against him, at the time Obama ordered his assassination. 

Americans want to know why congress is silently allowing  Obama to rule the nation by Executive Order through mandates, requirements, excessive regulations, excessive taxation, punishment and penalties.  Executive Orders were not intended to be used and abused so one man could rule a nation; thereby circumventing the legislative and judicial branches of government, as well as the constitution.      

Well then, how is it possible for a president to use tax dollars and appoint a federal government panel to gather names of Americans and create a “hit” list intended to murder people by assassination and by-pass due process of law as well as a right to a fair and just trial?  Americans should not have to pay taxes and live under the threat that they or their fellow Americans could be placed on a presidential “hit.”  It’s not rational, but rather disturbing that a president would use tax dollars to implement the assasisination of American citizens, meaning that the citizens coud be paying for their own murder.  I doubt that even Russia has such a program.  

Remarkable as it is – Americans and Brits are losing their constitutional freedom and liberty.  Actually, I read that the lineage of British royalty is tied to Germany and that several members of  British royalty had married Germans and embraced the nazis.  The articles read that British Royalty changed their German names to English surnames during WWII as the English people intensely opposed the nazis. 

So, it shouldn’t surprise the Brits if they do their homework how their government may have been infiltrated subtly with public servants who oppose freedom and liberty.  Most recently, Obama toasted his allegiance to the queen which hit international news.

Therefore, it should be unethical, immoral and considered an evil agenda for a president to appoint a government “hit” list panel, probably a panel of 9, to determine, who lives, and who dies.  In fact, Obamacare includes a panel of 9 federal appointees who shall decide who receives healthcare services and who does not.  The Obamacare mandates include assisted suicide and mandated abortions.  Obamacare is Deathcare. Brian Gerrish stated in a speech that Britain not only counsels adults on assisted suicide, but children who are sickly, as well. I always felt that Dr. Kervokian was a intentional tool used by the liberal socialists so people could get use to the words “assisted suicide” before it was implemented into Obamacare.

Although, a “hit” list refers to murdering people by assassination, it is immoral and unconstitutional to assassinate citizens in a nation ruled by laws. The congress must step up to the plate and investigate the validity of the Obama assassination program and how it is funded and if it exists, make it a priority held up for repeal.  Assassinations, assisted suicide, rationing and denying health care services; early end of life counseling; mandated abortions, and same-sex would definitely reduce the population of future U. S. Natural born and legal American citizens.  If you recall, a death program of mandated abortions as well as litigants led from the courtroom to the “death mobile” reduced the prison population as well as the number of females born in China over one or two generations.

How then shall we refer to the Obama assassination “hit” list as he and his panel decide who shall be murdered by assassination, not in Kenya or Afghanistan, Iran, or China, but in the United States of America?  How is a federal program creating a list of Americans to be murdered by assassination – guns for hire – be legal in America?  Obama wants Americans to pay more taxes so they can pay for their own assassinations, therefore,  I don’t see any  difference between Obama’s “hit” list and that of the “godfather.”  

Ironically, Americans pay taxes to be protected by their president and federal government, they don’t pay taxes thinking that they will be placed on a hit list and murdered by assassination or denied due process of law!

Some people may say, “Ya, but some times, really bad people should be murdered so we can just get rid of them.”

The Rule of Law  is established for a reason.  Innocent people are murdered and die from time to time by law enforcement, but officers are held accountable, so people are protected from wrongful deaths.

The nazis started off with one name on their “hit” list.  And, after the first “hit” was completed and the people said nothing, they went onto the second name on the list and the people said nothing.  Afterwards, it became easier and easier until millions were murdered and the people were too frightened to speak out as the army grew bigger and they marched into each city and forced their way into the privacy of the citizen’s homes.

In 2001 and 2008, Obama stated that congressional and constitutional authority is “meaningless.”  Think about that!  Why would a U.S. President boldly state that the U.S. constitution is “meaningless” after swearing an oath to uphold the constitution? 

How then does the U.S. Congress justify their failure to properly vet a U.S. President paid with U.S. tax dollars, meaning they are assisting in holding Obama above the law? Obama’s sworn oath pledging to uphold the U.S. Constitution, which includes Article II, preceded his Executive Order to conceal his personal records, therefore, his Executive Order granting himself the authority to circumvent Article II was written after his sworn oath; therefore his Executive Order should be rendered null and void.  How is it that a public servant can legally write a law which is self-serving, self-regulatory and self-protective for self-gain so he or she can circumvent the laws of the land holding himself above constitutional law?  Is that not granting one public servant absolute power?

Of course, people may ask, “Who cares?  He says he’s an American and was born in Hawaii that’s good enough for me.”  Well, then why isn’t it good enough for all illegals just to say that they were born in the United States?

Every congressional member and public servant pledges their allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, not to a public servant.  But, today, they appear to be more protective of the public servant than the constitution. 

You may say, “But,  public servants can’t assassinate American citizens or throw them into prisons without due process of law in America.”

It appears that Obama is a perfect example of how the senate hasn’t subpoenaed him to testify at the senate hearings involving Fast and Furious even though he launched the program and used stimulus tax dollars reported by deputy A.G. Ogden on March 24, 2009. So, who is responsible for the executions of 40,000 people between 2009 and 2001?  And, who is responsible for the $10,000,000 stimulus tax dollars or profits from the sale of the gun?

Of course, many people ask, “Who cares if Obama or Panetta ordered murder by assassination of a war criminal whose name is Osama?” 

But, I tell you that the Rule of Law cannot be violated unless you want your name placed on a “hit” list next!  The U.S. Constitution is what protects the guilty and the innocent from tyranny and mob rule executions.  Could this be an ungodly and immoral agenda with the intent of sensitizing Americans so they ignore the stories similar to the rumors that rang out in Europe when the people did nothing while they watched millions of people executed?

How do we know who will be on the hit list who is considered an “extremists” or “radical” or “dangerous” such as Christians?  Heterosexuals?  Conservatives? Pregnant Women?   Republicans?  Jews?  The Elderly?  Veterans?  Soldiers?  The Sick?  Whites?  Blacks?  Hispanics?  How then shall the Obama “hit” list panel determine which Americans shall live or die?

Of course, you may ask, “Who cares about Article II, anyway?  Who cares if a President of the United States is a “U.S. Natural Born” citizen?

Article II is the most important law of the land!  It should never be changed or circumvented.  The forefathers established Article II so that a usurper, a foreign enemy, spy, or illegal could not hold the highest office of the land and destroy the land of the free.

Ironically, to my knowledge, the congress nor judicial officers have called for senate hearings and the investigation into the assassination of an unarmed war criminal, Osama, (who was reported dead 9  times and on ice between December 2001 -2011).  Obama ordered Osama’s body dumped into the ocean and called it a burial, but Muslims don’t bury their leaders at sea. The fact that a U.S. President dumped a war criminal’s body into the ocean instead of turning it over to authorities for positive examination is unprecedented.  If a law enforcement officer committed such an act, he’d probably be sitting in a jail cell.  How do we know if Osama may have spilled the beans if captured about 911? 

Of course, people may ask, “But, who cares if he dumped Osama’s body at sea?”

Again, the Rule of Law must be followed by every citizen including public servants.  Osama was the master mind according to our government and we paid billions while living under threat for 10 years only to find out that he won’t be interrogated about 911.  Obama’s assassinations and attempted assassination should send shivers down the spine of every leader in the world, especially since Osama was unarmed; Al-Awaki was an American, who wasn’t charged with a crime; and Gaddafi didn’t attack America.  

Of course you may ask, “If a U.S. President thinks someone is a danger to the government then he should put a “hit” out on him?”

The Rule of Law in American makes it clear that a ”hit” list and gathering names of Americans to be placed on a “hit” list in my opinion equates to a conspiracy to commit murder.  “Hit” lists are utilized by criminals and shouldn’t be used by America’s government against their own citizens.  We have a Department of Justice.

Of course, people may say, “Who cares if Obama had Osama murdered by  assassination, after all, he was a war criminal. Besides, it would cost a lot of tax dollars to try him.” 

Think about that!  If it’s okay to assassinate unarmed people without constitutional or congressional authority then what’s to prevent a government from assassinating whistleblowers and witnesses and call it legal so the witnesses can’t testify against public servants or prominent people in courts of law?  How about people such as Osama and Gaddafi – could they have provided information that could have shed some light on 911?

But people say, “Who cares if Obama ordered the murder by assassination of Al- Alwaki, he was a very bad man.”

Should the U.S. Congress and judiciary fail to investigate the facts in the Osama and Al-Awaki assassinations then how shall the truth and the facts be reported for public review?

Of course, many people will ask, ”Who cares if Obama attempted to assassinate Gaddafi and killed his grandkids and freedom fighters, he was a very bad man.” 

And, once again, I warn Americans that the Rule of Law must be strictly followed or you shall reap the tears of tyranny should you not demand that congress and law enforcement uphold the constitution. The constitution  grants congress authority and power to declare war, not the president.  The excuse that one president or  public servant violated constitutional law in the past isn’t an excuse to continue violating the laws of the land. Besides, Gaddafi didn’t threaten America, but as Obama’s long time friend, he suddenly became Obama’s enemy and ended up #2 on Obama’s  “hit” list, but why?

Of course,  many people say, “But, they are all bad guys.  Who cares if they were murdered by assassination?”

Well, we have bad people in America.  We have some bad people in our government.  We have some bad people in all walks of life.  How then shall we complain if a good person enters a foreign nation and is murdered by assassination even if they are innocent?

Of course, people will say, “But, they shouldn’t have gone into that country, they were stupid.” 

Of course, people do stupid things, but assassinating people because they do some thing stupid or citizens who oppose political or religious agendas shouldn’t be a reason to compile a list of American names to be included in a ”hit” list and targeted for murder by assassination.

Listen up!  If the U.S. Congress and the Department of Justice fails to perform their fiduciary duty and follow the Rule of Law by investigating if an Executive Order to assassinate anyone including Americans exists then they should immediately vote and repeal such a law. 

Wake up, all you sleepy heads!  The U.S. Congress must stop the insanity.  In fact, there’s published articles reporting that the President of France met with Obama and later commented that he felt  Obama was “insane.” I don’t know about that, but I do believe that Americans who are mandated to pay taxes which will be used to pay the wages of a panel to create a “hit” list, so the federal government can hire “hit” men to assassinate American citizens is insane.

 Article II appears to be obsolete to Edolphous Towns, (D-NY) who scoffs at Article II and the vetting of a presidential candidate which has been in existence for 235 years!  How is it that Article II hasn’t been upheld by the federal government since December 2007 when Obama filed for his candidacy as president?  Every citizen must be vetted when employed, but why not Obama? 

The reason Obama can’t go off into the sunset without disclosing his identity is that he swore an oath to be honest and based upon that belief, he swore to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution, it wasn’t until after he took the oath of office that he violated his oath with the intent of immediately circumventint the U.S. Constitution by writing an unconstitutional Executive Order.  You ask, how is it unconstitutional?  It is unconstitutional because no public servant has been granted the authority to circumvent the constitution and re-write the law for self-serving and self-protecting and self-regulatory agendas for personal gain.

Ironically, Hillary Clinton and Obama as well as Rhinos attempted to attach an amendment to a military bill back in 2008 and prior to that year which would eliminate the vetting process and the words “U.S. Natural Born Citizen?  It remains a mystery why Hillary Clinton would assist Obama with such a task since she was competing against him and never disclosed that information during the campaign.

Now, we have Rep. Towns attempting to eliminate or change Article II of the U.S. Constitution which is the supreme law of the land. Is Rep. Towns wanting to protect Obama in the 2012 elections or does he plan to run for the highest office in the future and would prefer to eliminate the vetting process? 

Consequently,  Obama was never vetted properly meaning he was never identified properly, either. Obama swore an oath twice to uphold the U.S. Constitution as President of the United States, but no one in the federal government cares if he is legal or illegal as they’ve ignored Article II rendering it meaningless.  The alternative newspapers reported that Obama’s law license was under investigation by the Illinois State Bar of the Supreme Court and he is prohibited from practicing law as well as his wife, Michelle, but that information wasn’t disclosed by the federal government or media prior to the 2008 elections.  So, I guess, Rep. Towns doesn’t believe such information should be vetted and disclosed prior to elections. 

Obama swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution when he swore the Presidential Oath initiated by Justice Roberts twice, once with Obama’s hand on the bible, then without the bible. But, immediately after swearing an oath to uphold the law, Obama wrote an amendment to an existing Executive Order granting himself the power to circumvent Article II and the Vetting Process required by candidates which is a self-serving law.  His amendment granted himself the authority to write a law which is self-protecting, self-regulatory and for self-gain.  He circumvented Article II which he swore to uphold immediately upon taking office so he wouldn’t have to produce any personal records or background checks or identification documents to anyone in the federal government or the people who voted him into office without his personal consent, but how is that ethical or legal under the constitution?

So, my questions are these:

1.  How can a man who runs for the highest office in the land not be vetted or the fact that he was investigated by the Illinois State Bar and prohibited from practicing law prior to the elections be covered up by the government and the media? 

2.   How can a president who said he was a lawyer but is prohibited from practicing law be allowed the authority by the federal government to circumvent Article II and write an amendment to an existing Executive Order which provides himself the authority to conceal his entire life’s background from the entire nation who pays his wages?

3.  Under which constitutional authority can a president who is prohibited from practicing law circumvent Article II after he swore an oath to uphold the constitution?  Under which constitutional authority is he applying that provides him the authority to circumvent and write self-serving, self-regulating and self-protecting laws for self-gain?

So, does Rep. Towns and the rest of his supporters on this issue believe that a U.S. Presidential candidate shouldn’t have to provide his identification records, school records, birth certificate, criminal records, law records, Selective Service records, immigration records, marriage records, organizations, secret societies,  or any other personal information relating to his background for vetting which may have an adverse affect on the entire nation?

President Obama once said, “Anyone who doesn’t want to tell the truth has some thing to hide.”  So, what is President Obama hiding since he found it necessary to conceal all of his personal records from the American people and government?

Ironically, Americans under the Obama regime are subjected to unprecedented identification checks, but Obama has been allowed by the federal government to write self-regulatory and self-protective laws which circumvent Article II and the vetting process, which is unprecedented, unethical, and a Breach of Contract.  All public servants are elected based upon the information provided and the promises they make during the campaign which the Americans are led to believe in exchange for votes, jobs, and wages. I’ve been told that a verbal promise which is believed is a legal contract.  So, in my opinion, Obama has breached his contract of promises and transparency many times over and should be held accountable by the U.S. Congress.

Prior to the 2009 inauguration, I wrote a letter of grievance to each U.S. Justices and sent a copy to Philip J. Berg, esq., supporting his lawsuit filed with the U.S. Supreme Court alleging Obama is ineligible to be U.S. President, but they stonewalled the case prior to the inauguration. 

In conclusion, Obama swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, but he allegedly intended to circumvent Article II immediately upon taking office in violation of his sworn oath by writing a self-serving amendment to an Executive Order granting himself unprecedented authority to conceal his personal records so he wouldn’t have to comply with any court orders or the law of the land under Article II.  The issue of a public servant swearing an oath to uphold the constitution with the intent of circumventing the constitution shortly thereafter by writing self-serving laws so they are protected from the laws they swore to uphold is an issue that needs to be investigated by the U.S. Senate and explained to the American people.

 Finally,  Americans should demand to know under which constitutional authority can any public servant in the United States re-write, circumvent, or by-pass constitutional law by writing self-serving laws that protect themselves from being held accountable from the laws of the land instead of upholding the laws of the land. 

In other words, without Article II and the vetting process, anyone including a usurper, illegal, foreign spy, or criminal, could use Obama’s case precedent of 2008 and run for public office and demand that they not be vetted since Obama was never vetted!  And, that’s just plain insane!

Rose Colombo heard on radio stations such as KFI, KABC and seen on TV talk shows; written up as a Crusader and her quotes and articles published in local and major newspapers such as the L.A. Times, OC Register, Boston Globe, Denver Post….Read her riveting book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” and avoid the pitfalls of legal abuse and injustices available on Amazon and BN.com or visit her website at www.fightbacklegalabuse.com

America is in a supernatural battle of good vs. evil in these volatile times.  The pendulem on the Scales of Justice is swinging politically and socially  and America shall either choose freedom or “change.”  This is a past speech which I saved and shared awhile back when I was told it was too dangerous to share,  but felt it was so important that I saved it so I could share it for those who would like to read it again or for the first time delivered by Geert Wilders,  May God Protect America – Rose Colombo, American Legal Activist, Author, and Patriot!

Very scary……think 9/11…….think recent attempted distruction of one of our airliners…be aware………..